Thing is, play a PA600 style alongside, and you start to see what gets 'lost in translation'. Maybe, at least with the PA600, you can create kits and sounds that match the Yamaha's original overall sound a BIT better, but so far, I'm afraid it all reminds me of some cheap 15 year old arranger, and I can get one of those for less than the software alone! Not to mention that awful vibrato sound at 10:56! Wow! What was THAT on the T5? LOL That's where it all becomes easier to hear. you aren't throwing chord changes at the style. And sorry, but an Intro and an Ending (both of which are essentially SMF's, not style play). I'm also hearing these styles a lot drier than I think the original might have had. When vArranger plays these styles into the sound source, is it generally asking for GM2 type sounds, or is the mapping going deeper into the best sounds the modules make? Some of the SD-2 examples felt like the snare was pushed off to the left. Overall, I'd say, if those SD-2 and PA600 kits are the best choice to match the Yamaha ones, the drumkit mapping needs improvement. Without the original T5 style's audio, it isn't really a comparison, is it?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |